Case 2601462/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Sulieman v Domestic and General Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601462/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Sulieman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 26 August 2020, the tribunal gave Miss A Sulieman an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The listed reasons were non-compliance with a case management order concerning a schedule of loss dated 14 May 2020, failure to attend a preliminary hearing without explanation, and the claim not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 18 to 20 October 2020 would not take place. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment records that 'the claim is struck out' under rule 37. It does not specify the pleaded causes of action in the text provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.