Case 2601465/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Lambourn v Mr Alan Clegg and Mr Lee Fitchett — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601465/2020
- Decision date
- 13 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Lambourn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs M Lambourn against Mr Alan Clegg and Mr Lee Fitchett. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £599.33 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been paid her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £668.89 gross. The judgment describes this second element as a failure to pay holiday entitlement, and the award was made as a gross sum.
The claimant's application for compensation or damages for stress was refused because the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to make such an award in a claim of this type. The judgment also noted that the claimant could apply for a preparation time order within 21 days if she wished to do so.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £599.33. | Upheld | — | £599 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £668.89. | Upheld | — | £669 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,268
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.