Case 2601470/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Drury v Seaholme Bar and Grill Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601470/2023
- Decision date
- 1 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Drury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss T Drury brought complaints including a redundancy payment claim, notice pay and holiday pay against Seaholme Bar and Grill Ltd. Employment Judge Ahmed, sitting alone at Leicester via CVP, extended the time limit for the redundancy payment complaint on the basis that it was just and equitable to do so.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £945.00. The complaints of notice pay and holiday pay were found to have been presented out of time and were struck out. The decision was given orally at the hearing, so written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The time limit for bringing the redundancy payment complaint was extended on the grounds that it was just and equitable to do so. | Upheld | — | £945 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of notice pay was presented out of time and struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of holiday pay was presented out of time and struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £945
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.