Case 2601474/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Todd v Josh’s Care Company Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601474/2022
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Welch
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K Todd
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 24 February 2023 at Leicester Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge K Welch, sitting alone, determined that Ms K Todd was a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at all material times. The judgment records that this was by virtue of her conditions of dyslexia and/or anxiety.
The written record states that the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. This document records only that preliminary issue and does not contain a substantive liability decision or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 at all material times by virtue of dyslexia and/or anxiety. This record does not contain a substantive merits decision or remedy. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.