Case 2601477/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N JR VA-AY v Ernehale Lodge Care Home Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601477/2021
- Decision date
- 1 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N JR VA-AY
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 and determined the matter without a listed hearing. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £3,881. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,812.
The judgment does not record any separate basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings award. The hearing listed for 08 October 2021 was cancelled. On the figures stated, the total monetary award is £5,693 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross amount of £3,881. | Upheld | — | £3,881 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross amount of £1,812. | Upheld | — | £1,812 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,693
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.