Case 2601491/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Miss D Flawn v Cycle Specific Limited (In Creditors Liquidation) and 2 others — 2018

Case reference: 2601491/2018
Decision date: 15 October 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hutchinson

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

Miss D Flawn

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

In this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal found that the respondents had failed to consult with Miss D Flawn in accordance with their obligations under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. Compensation of £4,252.04 was ordered for that TUPE claim.

The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages of £567.68 were awarded against the second respondent on that claim.

The claimant was further found to have been unfairly dismissed. The judgment records a basic award of £654.16 and a compensatory award of £2,447.52, making a total unfair dismissal award of £3,101.68. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.

The listed hearing on 19 November 2018 was cancelled following this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Transfer of undertakings (TUPE)	The tribunal found the respondents failed to consult with the claimant in accordance with their obligations under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 and awarded compensation.	Upheld	—	£4,252
Breach of contract	The claimant was found to have been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and damages were awarded against the second respondent.	Upheld	—	£568
Unfair dismissal	The claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed. The award was split into a basic award of £654.16 and a compensatory award of £2,447.52, giving a total of £3,101.68. The judgment states that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.	Upheld	—	£3,102

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £7,921; across all upheld claims
Basic award: £654; statutory, unfair dismissal
Compensatory award: £2,448; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.