Case 2601507/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Inquieti v Pmc — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601507/2024
- Decision date
- 14 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Inquieti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Nottingham on 9 January 2025 before Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone. The claimant, Mr J Inquieti, was represented by Ms Lyn and the respondent, PMC, by Mr L Bronze, Counsel. Oral reasons were given at the hearing and the judgment was sent to the parties on 14 January 2025.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, arrears of wages, failure to provide written particulars of employment, and redundancy payment were not well-founded and were dismissed. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this claim as arrears of wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to this claim as failure to provide written particulars of employment; mapped to other because there is no specific taxonomy entry. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.