Case 2601523/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Ennis v DPD Group UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601523/2019
- Decision date
- 24 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Ennis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent as a delivery driver and brought claims originally including disability discrimination and age discrimination. The age discrimination claim had previously been dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining claims were identified as discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments, with the preliminary issue being whether the claimant was disabled within Section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of a small umbilical hernia.
The tribunal considered the claimant's evidence, medical reports, and written submissions. It found that the hernia had been present since birth, was tiny, had not required surgery or treatment, and had not led the claimant to seek GP advice, treatment, or painkillers in the years after it was identified. The tribunal also noted medical evidence of other health matters, including lumbar spine issues and general fitness, which were likely to account for restrictions reported by the claimant.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant had not established that the umbilical hernia amounted to a physical impairment or that it had any effect on his normal day-to-day activities, including lifting weights. It therefore found that he did not have a disability as defined by Section 6 Equality Act 2010, dismissed the disability discrimination claim, and cancelled the final hearing listed for September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal determined as a preliminary issue that the claimant did not have a disability within Section 6 Equality Act 2010 in relation to the relied-upon umbilical hernia. The disability discrimination claims, identified as discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments, therefore failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the age discrimination claim had been dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant on 23 October 2019. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 6 Equality Act 2010
- 2011 guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability
- EHRC Employment Code of Practice Appendix 1
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.