Case 2601528/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wellington and others v Paul John Construction (Leicester) Limited (In Administration) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601528/2021
- Decision date
- 22 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Wellington and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone at Leicester on 3 March 2022. The respondents did not appear. The judgment records that the claimants were represented by Mr J Thompson of Griffin Legal LLP. The tribunal dealt with a collective consultation complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The Employment Judge found that the complaint was well-founded. The judgment states that the first respondent failed to comply with the requirements of section 188. As a result, the tribunal made a protective award in respect of all employees of the first respondent named on the attached schedule who were employed at its premises at Stephenson Industrial Estate, Telford Way, Coalville LE67 3HP and who were dismissed as redundant on or after 26 April 2021.
The protective award was for a protective period of 90 days beginning on 26 April 2021. The judgment does not set out a separate monetary figure for each claimant in the extracted text, and it does not record any other remedy apart from the protective award. The listed case schedule names the individual claimants covered by the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the tribunal made a protective award for employees dismissed as redundant on or after 26 April 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.