Case 2601545/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Garner v Four Seasons Living Limited (in creditor’s voluntary liquidation) [R1] Secretary of State for Business and Trade [R2] FINAL HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601545/2023
- Decision date
- 2 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the name of the second respondent to Secretary of State for Business and Trade. The first respondent did not appear at the final hearing.
The claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim against the first respondent succeeded. The tribunal recorded continuous employment from 2 February 2015 to 14 November 2023, the claimant's age as 53 at termination, and gross weekly pay of £380.00, producing an award of £3,990.00.
The claims for unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay, and breach of contract for notice pay were dismissed because they were not presented within the statutory time limits.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the statutory redundancy payment claim against the first respondent succeeds and awards 7 weeks' gross pay x 1.5 = £3,990.00. | Upheld | — | £3,990 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was not presented within the statutory time limits and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was not presented within the statutory time limits and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment identifies the breach of contract claim as notice pay and states that it was not presented within the statutory time limits and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,990
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.