Case 2601548/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Jan v Midland Care Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601548/2019
- Decision date
- 22 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Jan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in which Employment Judge Britton struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 28 June 2019 it had given Mr N Jan an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
The reason given was that Mr Jan failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal said the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claims stayed listed for hearing on 17 October 2019. No remedy was awarded in this judgment and no findings were made on the merits of the remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37 after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 28 June 2019 to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.