Case 2601551/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C B J Kaonga v The Grand Union — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601551/2024
- Decision date
- 2 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C B J Kaonga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 April 2025, the tribunal gave Mr C B J Kaonga an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 18 December 2024 and that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing because he had failed to identify the correct identity of his employer.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 26 to 28 May 2026 was vacated and would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 15 April 2025 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on strike out grounds, including non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 18 December 2024 and failure to identify the correct employer. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.