Case 2601560/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr SM Walker and Ms DE Leake v Welbeck House Limited (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601560/2022
- Decision date
- 22 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr SM Walker and Ms DE Leake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Walker and Ms Leake presented their claim on 11 July 2022. The tribunal recorded that they sought a protective award following dismissal by reason of redundancy without consultation on 30 April 2020 when the respondent went into liquidation. The reasons note that the claims were nearly two years out of time under section 192 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and that the claim form gave no explanation for the delay or for why it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint within the three-month time limit.
The hearing on 8 November 2022 was listed to decide whether the claims were out of time or whether time should be extended. Neither party attended. After the lead claimant was contacted, he said he had thought the hearing was on 10 November 2022 and would therefore not attend. He later emailed the tribunal the following day saying he had been ill. Employment Judge Butler found those explanations inconsistent, not credible, and not reasonable.
The tribunal held that a claimant who issues a Tribunal claim must actively pursue it, including by attending hearings. Because the claimants had not done so, the tribunal struck out the claims for non-pursuit. The judgment does not record any monetary award because the claims were not determined on their merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was for a protective award arising from alleged dismissal by reason of redundancy without consultation. The tribunal struck the claim out because it had not been actively pursued; it did not determine the merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.192 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.