Case 2601566/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Anderson, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601566/2021
- Decision date
- 1 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms K Anderson, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchinson, sitting alone at Nottingham, recorded that the respondent had not complied with the unless order issued on 28 January 2022 and sent to the parties on 1 February 2022. As a consequence, the response was dismissed. The record is procedural and does not determine the underlying merits of the case.
The tribunal listed a further hearing by CVP on 6 April 2022 to make a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The claimant was directed to provide an updated schedule of loss and copies of mitigation and remedy evidence by 22 March 2022. The written record also noted that reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This was a closed telephone preliminary hearing. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to comply with the unless order issued on 28 January 2022 and sent on 1 February 2022, and the response was dismissed. A further hearing was listed for 6 April 2022 to make a Rule 21 determination; the underlying merits were not decided in this record. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- unless order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.