Case 2601568/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Karen Blair v SDS Care Limited t/a Home Instead Senior Care — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601568/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Karen Blair
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 28 October 2019 before Employment Judge Jeram sitting alone in Leicester, the claimant was represented by Mr Partridge and the respondent by Ms Griffiths. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims for notice pay, arrears of pay, holiday pay and other payments were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of those withdrawn claims. It also states that the remaining claims for constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination would proceed to a preliminary hearing on 23 January 2020, so no substantive determination was made on those claims in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was dismissed after the claimant withdrew it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay was dismissed after the claimant withdrew it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for holiday pay was dismissed after the claimant withdrew it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for 'other payments' was dismissed after the claimant withdrew it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.