Case 2601576/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Nurun Nahar Khair v R1) The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police R2) Mr Gary Jacques — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601576/2021
- Decision date
- 9 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nurun Nahar Khair
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 22 April 2022 before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone, the tribunal recorded that the disability discrimination claim and the whistleblowing claim were dismissed in their entirety following withdrawal by the claimant. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Miss G Roets.
The tribunal granted the application to amend the current claim. It recorded that the claims going forward were direct discrimination and harassment based on religion or some other philosophical belief, and said that orders were provided within the record of the case management hearing published the same day.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed in its entirety following its withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed in its entirety following its withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.