Case 2601580/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M Hull v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601580/2017
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M Hull
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by an order dated 11 July 2019, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated grounds considered were that the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant had been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious, that the claimant had not complied with the rules of procedure or Tribunal orders, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, and had not requested a hearing. The listed October 2019 hearing was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim but does not identify the underlying causes of action in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.