Case 2601595/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Jablonskaja First v DPD Group UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601595/2021
- Decision date
- 2 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Welch
- Venue
- Leicester
- Panel members
- Mrs B Tidd, Ms J Dean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Jablonskaja First
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Leicester before Employment Judge K Welch with two lay members, gave a unanimous judgment after a hearing from 30 May to 2 June 2023.
The judgment records that the claimant's pregnancy and maternity discrimination claim under section 18 Equality Act 2010 failed and was dismissed. It also records that the claimant's direct race discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010 failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally, and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of pregnancy and maternity discrimination under section 18 Equality Act 2010 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of direct race discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 18 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.