Case 2601597/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601597/2022
- Decision date
- 1 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 1 February 2023 at Nottingham via CVP, Employment Judge Fredericks dismissed Mrs J Simpson's unfair dismissal complaint against Kisimul Group Limited. The tribunal held that the claim was presented out of time and that the time limit should not be extended because it was reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been brought in time, with the result that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.
The judgment records that full reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of sending the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at an open preliminary hearing because the complaint was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was not extended because it was reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been brought in time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.