Case 2601598/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Georgie Tilson-Brown v Browns (Derby) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601598/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Georgie Tilson-Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a Record of an Open Preliminary Hearing on 17 May 2022, Employment Judge Hutchinson sat alone in Nottingham and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claims.
The claimant succeeded on a breach of contract claim relating to notice. The tribunal found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages of £2,750.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,175 for holiday pay. It further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,147.92.
The total sum payable by the respondent was £7,072.92.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,750. | Upheld | — | £2,750 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,175. | Upheld | — | £1,175 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,147.92. | Upheld | — | £3,148 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,073
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.