Case 2601603/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Rowe v Regent Wood Turning Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601603/2019
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Rowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not entered a response. Employment Judge Camp recorded that the claimant, Mrs C Rowe, had permission to amend her claim to include unpaid wages and, potentially, holiday pay on an ongoing basis.
The tribunal found that Regent Wood Turning Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £8,130, described in the judgment as 15 weeks’ pay.
The judgment also noted that the case remained listed for a final hearing on 6 September 2019. At that hearing, the tribunal would deal with any claim for unpaid wages from 19 August 2019 onwards, the holiday pay claim, which was said not to be understood at present, and potentially a claim under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for compensation for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £8,130, described as 15 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £8,130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,130
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.