Case 2601604/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Dowse v SRP Hire Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601604/2021
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Dowse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Dowse, brought complaints of unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages against SRP Hire Solutions Limited. The hearing took place at Nottingham via CVP before Employment Judge Fredericks on 4 and 5 July 2022. The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted £620.00 from the claimant's wages in July 2021. It ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided unless requested in writing within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted £620.00 from the claimant's wages in July 2021 and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £620 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £620
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.