Case 2601606/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Lacey First v Welbeck House Ltd (in liquidation) Second Respondent: Secretary of State for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy Heard: Nottingham — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601606/2022
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Legard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Lacey First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Nottingham on 21 November 2022 before Employment Judge Legard sitting alone. The claimant, Mr P Lacey, did not attend. The claimant and both respondents were unrepresented, and the tribunal received written submissions from both respondents before giving judgment.
The tribunal stated that the claim was struck out because it was out of time and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. No substantive liability findings were made, and no remedy was awarded.
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. The judgment text does not specify the underlying type of claim, so it is recorded here as a generic tribunal claim struck out on jurisdictional and limitation grounds.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action beyond referring to 'the claim'; it was struck out as out of time and because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.