Case 2601613/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr CL Russell v Smart Windscreens Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601613/2019
- Decision date
- 2 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr CL Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge P Britton dated 2 July 2019. The judgment states that the claim succeeds, but it does not set out separate findings on the individual pleaded heads of claim. The case context identifies unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages as the listed categories, but the judgment text itself does not break those claims down separately.
The tribunal directed that remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing on 24 September 2019. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment, and no remedy breakdown is provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Rule 21 judgment records that 'the claim succeeds' but does not separate the pleaded heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the case context. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment records that 'the claim succeeds' but does not separate the pleaded heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the case context. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.