Case 2601626/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R M Creasy v Creative Spaces Group Ltd T/a Creasy Garden Buildings — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601626/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R M Creasy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, dated 6 August 2019, in which the respondent was found to be in default. The listed hearing on 22 August 2019 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,226.34. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,536.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,048. Separately, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £484. The total of the monetary awards was £8,294.34.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,226.34. | Upheld | — | £2,226 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,536. | Upheld | — | £2,536 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,048. | Upheld | — | £3,048 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £484. | Upheld | — | £484 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,294
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.