Case 2601639/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Connor v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601639/2018
- Decision date
- 2 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell Members
- Venue
- Nottingham
- Panel members
- Ms J Hogarth, Ms K McLeod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Connor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Pharmacy Delivery and Collection Service Driver and was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of depression, severe anxiety and stress. After his return from sickness absence, two changes affected the evening shift: drivers were no longer permitted to split the early route, and monthly care home deliveries were sometimes added. The tribunal accepted that the first change was likely to have increased the claimant's workload because he usually did the early route, but found that he was not required to work outside his contract or beyond his contractual hours.
For the section 15 Equality Act claim, the tribunal found that the claimant's absence arose in consequence of his disability, but that the relevant changes were not because of that absence. It accepted the respondent's evidence that the changes resulted from national instructions and operational reasons, and found no causal link between the absence and the changes. The disability discrimination claim was dismissed.
For constructive dismissal, the tribunal considered the matters relied on by the claimant, including the requested contract change, allocation of work, pay and absence-recording issues, deletion from Facebook, events on 13 June 2018, and the Lightfoot records. It accepted that the claimant genuinely believed the respondent's conduct justified resignation and that errors had been made, but found, viewed objectively and as a whole, that there had been no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The constructive unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims therefore failed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010 for discrimination arising from disability. The tribunal found no unfavourable treatment and, in any event, no causal link between the claimant's disability-related absence and the changes to work allocation. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The claim was described as constructive unfair dismissal under section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found no breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal was addressed with the constructive dismissal issue. The tribunal found the constructive unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- Pnaiser v NHS England [2016] IRLR
- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- implied term of trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.