Case 2601640/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr John Dillon (2) Mrs Sarah Dillon v Market Harborough Conservative Club — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601640/2022
- Decision date
- 29 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkey Representation
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr John Dillon (2) Mrs Sarah Dillon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leicester on 28 November 2022, Employment Judge Sharkey heard claims by Mr John Dillon and Mrs Sarah Dillon against Market Harborough Conservative Club. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and sets out only the dispositive result.
For the First Claimant, the tribunal held that he was not constructively dismissed and that his unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. His case was dismissed.
For the Second Claimant, the tribunal reached the same conclusion: she was not constructively dismissed and her unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. Her case was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | First Claimant, Mr John Dillon; the tribunal found he was not constructively dismissed and his unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Second Claimant, Mrs Sarah Dillon; the tribunal found she was not constructively dismissed and her unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.