Case 2601643/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Moyes v Source Bioscience Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601643/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge V Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Moyes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs L Moyes brought a claim against Source Bioscience Limited for automatic unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A and/or section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal, sitting alone, held that the claim was not well founded and dismissed it.
The written judgment does not set out the tribunal's substantive reasons. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time, so no further findings or remedy assessment are contained in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claim was stated as automatic unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A and/or section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records no written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 103A ERA 1996
- section 100 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.