Case 2601658/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Buttery v Pohwer and 2 others — 2026
- Case reference
- 2601658/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms G Buttery
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short judgment on withdrawal dated 24 September 2019. It records that the proceedings against the second and third respondents, Mosaic: Shaping Disability Services and Age UK Leicestershire and Rutland Limited, were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim. The judgment does not set out the underlying substantive issues or determine the claim on its merits.
The claim against the first respondent, Pohwer, was resolved by settlement. No monetary terms are recorded in the judgment, and no remedy award was made by the tribunal. The judgment is therefore procedural only and does not contain findings on liability.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The proceedings against the second and third respondents were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claim against the first respondent was resolved via a settlement. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.