Case 2601660/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Dube. v Chalice Medical Ltd AT AN OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601660/2021
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Dube.
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing in Nottingham on 26 July 2021 before Employment Judge Clark sitting alone. Ms L Dube appeared in person and Chalice Medical Ltd was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant's application for interim relief was refused.
The tribunal did not determine the substantive claim at this stage. Instead, it ordered that, to the extent not already processed, the claim would be served on the respondent in accordance with the rules, with standard directions to follow towards a future hearing. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant's application for interim relief was refused at an open preliminary hearing. The underlying claim was to be served on the respondent and directed towards a future hearing; no merits determination was made in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.