Case 2601675/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Old Whittington Recreation Ground — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601675/2022
- Decision date
- 26 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Tracey Pepper brought claims against Old Whittington Recreation Ground. The case was heard at Nottingham on 17 January 2023 before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone. The respondent did not appear. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and later recorded in writing on 26 January 2023.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,490.64. It also found that the respondent had dismissed her in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered compensation of £1,924.56.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £4,490.64. | Upheld | — | £4,491 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered compensation of £1,924.56. | Upheld | — | £1,925 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awards £160.38. | Upheld | — | £160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,576
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.