Mrs L Karkach v Louisa Tinker — 2020

Case reference: 2601681/2020
Decision date: 29 September 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Heap

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs L Karkach

Respondent

Louisa Tinker

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment dated 29 September 2020. The tribunal found that the respondent, Louisa Tinker, unfairly dismissed the claimant, Mrs L Karkach.

No orders were made for reinstatement, re-engagement or compensation because the claimant sought no remedy. The hearing listed for 1 October 2020 was cancelled.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Rule 21 judgment states that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant, but no orders were made as to reinstatement, re-engagement or compensation because the claimant sought no remedy.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.