Case 2601682/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Weightman v ViVO Smart Medical Devices Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601682/2022
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Weightman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J Weightman, brought a claim against ViVO Smart Medical Devices Limited that the judgment identifies as a claim for unpaid notice pay. The case was heard at Nottingham by CVP on 14 December 2022 before Employment Judge Brewer, with Mr Weightman appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr D Wright.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unpaid notice pay succeeded. No further liability issues, factual findings, or legal tests are set out in the written record provided.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,803.60. The judgment does not break that sum down into separate heads of loss or record any additional remedy element beyond the single monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unpaid notice pay succeeds and orders payment of £1,803.60. | Upheld | — | £1,804 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,804
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.