Case 2601684/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Johann v F Brazil Reinforcements Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601684/2022
- Decision date
- 13 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Johann
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 November 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr M Johann an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing before the claim was struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with an order to provide a schedule of loss by 21 September 2022, and that despite being reminded by the respondent on 30 September 2022 he still had not complied or communicated with the respondent or the Tribunal.
The Tribunal also recorded that the claimant had failed to file an agenda for the case management hearing listed for 18 November 2022 and failed, without any reason, to attend that hearing. It found that he had not made written representations, or had not made sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out or requesting a hearing.
The judgment therefore states that the claim is struck out. It also notes that the hearing listed to commence on 11 December 2023 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause or causes of action. The claim was struck out for failure to comply with case management orders and failure to engage with the Tribunal process. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.