Case 2601685/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A MacGuire v Angela Kaponas — 2018
- Case reference
- 2601685/2018
- Decision date
- 16 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A MacGuire
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment dated 16 October 2018. The tribunal recorded that the claims succeed and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a further Remedy Hearing. The extracted text does not set out separate factual findings on liability or any head-specific reasons.
The judgment converted the hearing listed for 2 November 2018 into a remedy hearing with a one-hour time estimate. It also cancelled the hearing listed for 28 to 30 October 2019. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment because remedy was left to be determined later.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment records that the claims succeed, but it does not set out head-specific findings or any quantum. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The Rule 21 judgment records that the claims succeed, but it does not set out head-specific findings or any quantum. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The case listing refers to sexual orientation discrimination and transsexualism, but the extracted Rule 21 text does not split the discrimination heads. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Rule 21 judgment records that the claims succeed, but it does not set out head-specific findings or any quantum. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment records that the claims succeed, but it does not set out head-specific findings or any quantum. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | The Rule 21 judgment records that the claims succeed, but it does not set out the protected act or any quantum. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.