Case 2601686/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hider v Indigo Home Interiors (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601686/2023
- Decision date
- 5 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Hider
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 5 July 2024 at Leicester before Employment Judge Ahmed sitting alone. The claimant, Mr M Hider, did not attend and was not represented, and neither respondent attended or was represented.
The judgment records a single outcome: the claimant's claim was dismissed. The extracted text does not include any reasons, findings of fact, or claim-by-claim analysis beyond that dismissal.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the extracted text contains no remedy assessment or apportionment. The panel was judge-alone, so there were no lay members.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the claimant's claim was dismissed; no separate reasons are given for this claim type in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claimant's claim was dismissed; no separate reasons are given for this claim type in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claimant's claim was dismissed; no separate reasons are given for this claim type in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.