Case 2601706/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Samrai v Choices Care Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601706/2021
- Decision date
- 13 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Varnam Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Samrai
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a preliminary hearing on whether Ms S Samrai's unfair and wrongful dismissal claims were out of time on the Respondent's case that she resigned by telephone on 17 December 2020. After reviewing the claimant's and respondent's telephone records, the absence of any contemporaneous notes, the letter dated 21 December 2020, and the delayed P45, the judge preferred the Claimant's evidence and found that the alleged 17 December call did not take place. The tribunal also accepted that the Claimant did not receive the 21 December letter.
The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 12 April 2021, when the Claimant delivered a fit note and was told by Ms Hyde that she no longer worked for the Respondent. On that basis, the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims were brought in time. The judge did not make any positive finding on the exact words spoken on 12 April or on whether the termination on that date was a dismissal, leaving that issue for any later hearing if still disputed.
The tribunal allowed the Claimant's application to amend the claim to add a section 15 Equality Act 2010 claim of discrimination arising from disability, based on her case that she was asthmatic, had to shield during the Covid-19 pandemic, and was dismissed because of that absence. Applying Selkent and the balance of prejudice, the judge extended time on a just and equitable basis, limited the amendment to the solicitor's e-mail of 30 November 2021, and directed amended Grounds of Resistance and a further preliminary hearing. The merits of the disability discrimination claim were not determined at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary ruling only: the tribunal found the effective date of termination was 12 April 2021, so the claim was in time. The merits of unfair dismissal were not determined at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Preliminary ruling only: the tribunal found the effective date of termination was 12 April 2021, so the claim was in time. The merits of wrongful dismissal were not determined at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal allowed an amendment to add a section 15 Equality Act 2010 claim of discrimination arising from disability. Time was extended on a just and equitable basis and the amendment was limited to the solicitor's e-mail of 30 November 2021; the merits were not determined at this hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.111
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 Article 7
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.207B
- Equality Act 2010 s.123
- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Conteh v First Security Guards Ltd
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.