Case 2601712/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mannion (deceased) By Ms K Flint, the appropriate person v T M Mannion Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) Determined on the papers without a hearing at Leicester Hearing Centre, 5a New Walk, Leicester, LE1 6TE — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601712/2021
- Decision date
- 6 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mannion (deceased) By Ms K Flint, the appropriate person
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Mannion died on 13 February 2021 and Ms K Flint, as the appropriate person for his estate, pursued a claim for holiday pay outstanding on termination of employment. The respondent was in creditors’ voluntary liquidation and did not present a response. The tribunal also recorded that an additional redundancy pay claim had been dismissed on withdrawal.
On limitation, the tribunal held that the holiday pay claim was brought about 2.5 months late, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within the 3-month time limit in regulations 30 and 30B of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It accepted evidence that the sudden death had a significant impact on Ms Flint, who was dealing with grief, three young children, her own work, letters of administration, and did not know of the time limit until 5 August 2021. Once informed, she acted promptly. The tribunal applied a liberal construction in favour of the employee and referred to Dedman, Wall’s Meat, Schultz, and Asda in explaining the test.
On the substantive holiday pay calculation, the tribunal accepted that the holiday year ran from 1 June to 31 May, that no leave had been taken by the date of death, and that gross weekly pay was £599.60. Applying regulation 14(3), it found that 3.96 weeks of holiday pay was due and awarded £2,374.42 gross. It rejected the estate’s higher calculation because it did not follow the statutory formula.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998, regulations 30 and 30B. Tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within 3 months and that it was brought within a reasonable further time. Awarded £2,374.42 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,374 |
| Redundancy | Additional redundancy pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,374
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- not reasonably practicable test under regulation 30(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Wall’s Meat Co Ltd v Khan
- Schultz v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- regulation 14(3) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.