Case 2601737/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Bethell v GBM Manufacturing Limited (In administration) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601737/2021
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Bethell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Bethell was employed by GBM Manufacturing Limited at one establishment. The tribunal found that all staff were dismissed as redundant on 4 August 2021, after the business entered administration on 3 August 2021. There was no recognised trade union, no existing employee representatives, and no attempt to consult or to begin the election of employee representatives before dismissal. Because more than 20 employees at one establishment were dismissed within 90 days, the duty under s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was engaged.
The tribunal found there had been no meaningful compliance with the collective consultation duties and no material partial compliance to reduce the award. It rejected any suggestion that special circumstances had been shown. Applying GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180, it made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days, with the recoupment provisions applying. On the weekly gross pay of £585 found at termination, that protective award equates to £7,521.43 gross.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that for the 2021 leave year the claimant had 21 days' contractual leave, plus 5 days carried over from 2020 and bank holidays converted to 8 days, but one extra contractual day was not payable on termination. It found that 11.5 days, or 2.3 weeks, remained untaken at termination and awarded £1,345.50 gross under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Claims for arrears of pay, notice pay and a statutory redundancy payment were met by the Secretary of State and were dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under ss.188-189 TULRCA 1992; the tribunal ordered the maximum protected period of 90 days. | Upheld | — | £7,521 |
| Holiday pay | Regulation 14 WTR 1998 award for 11.5 days (2.3 weeks) untaken leave outstanding at termination. | Upheld | — | £1,346 |
| Redundancy | Met by the Secretary of State; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay claim met by the Secretary of State; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim met by the Secretary of State; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,867
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.