Case 2601753/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Henry v Nottinghamshire County Council AT A PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard: (in private; by telephone) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601753/2020
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Henry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 30 May 2023, Employment Judge Clark sitting alone varied by consent the judgment dated 2 March 2023 and sent to the parties on 15 March 2023. The only change recorded was to paragraph 6 concerning the unauthorised deduction from wages claim in further particulars to case 2601753/2020.
The tribunal recorded that the claim was withdrawn insofar as it related to unpaid expenses, but it was not dismissed. It also stated, for the avoidance of doubt, that the related claim of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of pay was not withdrawn. No merits determination or monetary award is set out in this reconsideration judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reconsideration judgment varied the earlier judgment by consent to record that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was withdrawn only insofar as it related to unpaid expenses, and that this part was not dismissed. The judgment also stated that the related claim in respect of pay was not withdrawn. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.