Case 2601757/2019 · Employment Tribunal
The Red Carpet Cinema Ltd v Miss Zoe Thompson — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601757/2019
- Decision date
- 13 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
The Red Carpet Cinema Ltd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that The Red Carpet Cinema Ltd's counter claim, described as an Employers Contract Claim, succeeded against Miss Zoe Thompson. The only monetary figure stated in the judgment is damages of £25,000, awarded as claimed.
The extracted text does not set out the factual background, any disputed issues, or the tribunal's reasoning beyond the success of the counter claim. It also does not record any separate award breakdown, interest, or additional remedy components. The judgment is therefore limited to the order that Miss Zoe Thompson pay damages of £25,000 to The Red Carpet Cinema Ltd.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment states that the claimant's counter claim, described as an Employers Contract Claim, succeeds and damages are awarded in the sum of £25,000. No further reasoning or breakdown is given in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,000
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £25,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.