Case 2601758/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Miss D Wane v Blue Diamond Cleaning Services Ltd Matt Clifford — 2018

Case reference: 2601758/2018
Decision date: 6 November 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hutchinson

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss D Wane

Respondent

Blue Diamond Cleaning Services Ltd Matt Clifford

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This is a short Rule 21 default judgment. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to present a response within the relevant time limit and that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.

The judgment states only that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. It also cancels the hearings listed on 28 November 2018 and 10, 12 and 13 June 2019. The extracted text does not give reasons, does not break down the pleaded heads of claim, and does not record any monetary award in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The short Rule 21 judgment records only that the claim succeeds and does not separate the pleaded heads or give reasons; this claim type is taken from the case context listing.	Upheld	Disability	—
Unfair dismissal	The short Rule 21 judgment records only that the claim succeeds and does not separate the pleaded heads or give reasons; this claim type is taken from the case context listing.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the .

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.