Case 2601761/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Anisa Karaj v Valland Care and Support Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601761/2024
- Decision date
- 13 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Anisa Karaj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims against the respondent on 13 September 2024. The judgment records that a part Judgment had previously been given in her favour after a hearing before EJ Ahmed on 1 May 2025, but does not identify the claim determined in that part Judgment or any remedy.
The remaining maternity and pregnancy discrimination claim was subject to orders requiring the claimant to provide further information. The claimant did not comply with those orders or respond to Tribunal correspondence about the hearing listed for 23 October 2025. After no response was received to a strike out warning, the remaining claim was struck out on the basis that it was not being actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that a part Judgment had previously been given in the claimant's favour, but gives no detail of that adjudicated claim or any remedy. This extraction captures the remaining maternity and pregnancy discrimination claim that was struck out. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.