Case 2601771/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Miss R Hunt v v Oasis Fashions Limited (in administration) — 2022

Case reference: 2601771/2020
Decision date: 18 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hawksworth Date

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss R Hunt v

Respondent

Oasis Fashions Limited (in administration)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found the claimant's complaint well-founded that the respondent failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment records that the claimant was assigned to a unit comprising six branches, in which the respondent proposed to dismiss more than 20 employees.

The tribunal made a protective award under section 189 in favour of the claimant for the maximum protected period of 90 days, beginning on 15 April 2020. The award was equivalent to remuneration for that period. The judgment also records that the recoupment regulations apply and sets out the respondent's obligations to provide employee information to the Secretary of State before payment is required.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Protective award claim for failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The award was expressed as 90 days' remuneration rather than a fixed monetary sum.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.