Case 2601776/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Puwai v Caring Carers Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601776/2019
- Decision date
- 8 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Puwai
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined on a strike-out application rather than on the merits of the underlying claim. By letter dated 25/2/2021, the Tribunal gave Mr F Puwai an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out under rule 37.
The judgment records the decision on 8/3/2021 by Employment Judge Swann. No substantive liability findings or remedy award are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim. It states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 25/2/2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.