Case 2601789/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Iona Stancu v The Recruitment Group Limited and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601789/2024
- Decision date
- 29 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Leicester Heard
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs Iona Stancu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought two claims arising from her engagement by the first respondent as an agency worker at the second respondent's premises between 26 January 2024 and 21 June 2024. The judgment records that unfair dismissal, breach of contract and whistleblowing detriment claims had previously been withdrawn at a preliminary hearing, although the operative judgment at this hearing struck out the race discrimination and breach of contract claims.
The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend her race discrimination claim to add an allegation that the termination of her engagement by the second respondent was race discrimination. It applied the Selkent principles, considered the nature and timing of the amendment and time limits, and concluded that the proposed allegation was new, out of time without explanation, and in any event had no prospect of success because the assignment came to an end.
The remaining race discrimination allegations concerned work allocation and training. The tribunal found no evidence that any alleged unfair treatment was because of race and struck out the race discrimination claims and the notice pay breach of contract claim as having no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal also recorded concerns about the claimant's conduct of the proceedings and concluded that the claims should be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons record that the claimant withdrew her unfair dismissal claim at the 30 June 2025 preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The reasons record that the claimant withdrew her whistleblowing detriment claim at the 30 June 2025 preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The claimant described her nationality and race as Romanian. The application to amend the race discrimination claim was refused, and the race discrimination claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The operative judgment struck out the breach of contract claim. The reasons state that the notice pay claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant was entitled to, and was provided with, one week's notice. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Selkent Bus Company Limited (trading as Stagecoach) v Moore [1996] IRLR 661
- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- Anyanwu v Southbank Students Union and others [2001] ICR 391
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2007] ICR 1126
- Van Rensburg v Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames & Others UKEAT/0096/07
- Chandhok v Tirkey UKEAT/0190/14/KN
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.