Case 2601796/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Rawski v A and H Structures Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601796/2018
- Decision date
- 21 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Rawski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Rawski, was employed by A and H Structures Limited as a welder from 23 May 2011. This hearing, before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone in Nottingham on 15 May 2019, was to determine whether the claim had been presented out of time. The judge considered the ACAS early conciliation material under s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996 and found that the first ACAS early conciliation certificate, started on 9 July 2018 and ending on 16 July 2018, extended time so that the ET1 presented on 30 July 2018 was in time. The later second certificate was treated as irrelevant to that conclusion.
The judge identified the live substantive issues for the full hearing as whether the claimant resigned on Friday 13 April 2018 or was dismissed when he came in on Monday 16 April with an interpreter and a resignation letter giving two weeks' notice. The claimant's case was that he intended to work out his notice period and had arranged a delayed start with a new employer for that reason. The respondent's case was that he had already resigned and was not intending to work, relying on evidence said to show dissatisfaction and conduct on the Friday evening before he left.
The judgment recorded that there was no discrimination claim before the tribunal. It also noted possible issues of notice pay, holiday pay, and contributory conduct if dismissal were found, including the prospect of a reduction under s.122(2) ERA 1996. No merits finding or monetary award was made in this judgment; the practical outcome was that the claim was allowed to proceed and the listed hearing length was reduced from three days to two.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary timeliness ruling only. The tribunal held the claim was presented in time under s.207B ERA 1996; no merits finding was made on whether the claimant resigned or was dismissed. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Preliminary timeliness ruling only. The tribunal accepted that the notice-pay claim could proceed in time; no liability or quantum was decided. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.207B ERA 1996
- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.122(2) ERA 1996
- Westwood v Secretary of State for Employment 1985 ICR 209 HL
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.