Case 2601797/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Poole v Kiddie Winks Day Care Nursery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601797/2019
- Decision date
- 13 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Poole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 12 August 2020 Employment Judge Hutchinson struck out the claim brought by Miss N Poole against Kiddie Winks Day Care Nursery Ltd. The judgment states that, by e-mail dated 29 May 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to be actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint.
The hearing listed for 12, 13 and 14 October 2020 was vacated and will not take place. No financial award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it records only that the entire claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.