Case 2601801/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A R M Aubert & Mr D Aubert v NanoFCM Co. Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601801/2023
- Decision date
- 28 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A R M Aubert & Mr D Aubert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Nottingham on 18 November 2024, Employment Judge Victoria Butler, sitting alone, heard a costs application in cases 2601801/2023 and 2601964/2023. The written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The tribunal ordered NanoFCM Co. Limited to pay the claimants' costs in the amount of £11,000 plus VAT. The judgment states that this figure comprised counsel's brief fee of £7,000 and the claimants' solicitor's costs of £3,000. The extract does not record any further breakdown of the costs order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Costs judgment only. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimants' costs in the stated amount of £11,000 plus VAT. The extract also states that this comprised counsel's brief fee of £7,000 and solicitor's costs of £3,000, although those sub-figures do not sum to £11,000. | Upheld | — | £11,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.