Case 2601801/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Briggs Mrs Karen Briggs v Carbee Limited (In Liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601801/2024
- Decision date
- 2 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln Heard
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Briggs Mrs Karen Briggs
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchinson sat alone by CVP at Lincoln Heard on 24 February 2025. The claimants appeared in person. Carbee Limited (in liquidation) did not appear, and the Secretary of State was represented by the Insolvency Service.
The judge gave an oral judgment at the hearing. In the written record, the tribunal states that the claimants' claims for redundancy pay, notice pay, holiday pay and wages fail and are dismissed.
The written record does not set out separate reasons for each head of claim. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the material findings available from this document are limited to the dismissal of all claims and the absence of any award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to 'notice pay'; this has been classified as a breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'wages'; this has been classified as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.